The Red Herring over who speaks for #slutwalkjhb

By Walter Pike
In response to Jen Thorpe’s article regarding whether it is appropriate for a man to lead a woman’s movement.
Certainly soccer clubs are seldom run by soccer players and mines are often run by accountants. In the case of something like a woman’s movement however, where the point is for women to take a voice, I would think that it would be a distinct second choice to be lead by a man. So while I understand Jen Thorpe’s analysis and am largely in agreement I am not happy with some the comments to that post.
Of course this was all in response to a vicious, although incoherent, assault on me by Gillian Schutte who calls herself a radical feminist. I don’t want to deal with the details here other than to say that her core accusation that I was the self appointed leader of slutwalk in Johannesburg is without foundation. I am neither self appointed nor am I the leader. One of my roles though was to be a spokesperson and as such I am one of the two official faces of #slutwalkjhb. I argue that my participation in the slutwalk organising committee and as a spokesman is entirely appropriate and contributes directly to the goals of slutwalk.
Our understanding of slutwalk is that it is a social media enabled global grassroots movement aimed at spreading the idea that no victim of sexual abuse can be blamed for that abuse, the blame always rests with the perpetrator. How this movement spontaneously grew as a reaction to the rather silly utterances of a Canadian policeman into probably the most successful movement of this type in history is well known and won’t be repeated.
Social media enabled grassroots movements are a phenomena of 2011, so there is no surprise that they are misunderstood. Starting with the events in January in North Africa now known as the Arab Spring and finishing the year in Russia and in countless smaller protests the largest being the Occupy movement, they different to older protests we have become used to. For one thing, they are not coordinated, there is no central office, there is no franchising system there are no rules and that means that they are leaderless. The idea which is being spread does coordinate around people but those people can be seen as nodes in a complex social graph. The idea spreads through that social discussion, moving across different media types and into physical face to face meetings and back online.
These movements are all self-coordinated around a simple, popular and remarkable idea, always an idea worthy of being remarked on. Slutwalk, whether by design or by strategy, hit the formula perfectly. The word slut in itself is remarkable because of its commonly understood meaning and it makes sure that people cannot ignore the slutwalk concept and that leads them to talk about it and the idea spreads.
Feminist scholars will refer to Foaucalt in understanding this movement, but its far more likely that it was a gut reaction to what that policeman said and it’s this essence, the feeling of injustice, that many people in society feel that has fueled its spread. In a world where media is no longer merely a source of information but a site of coordination anyone, with or without an organisation behind them can start a meme and if its remarkable and people identify with it then people will tell their friends and when their friends can number thousands and the weak links from them to their friends and their friends friends and so on can reach tens of millions more the spread can be rapid.
Slutwalk has been successful because it is accessible and understandable to everyone, because it does not follow any structured agenda, just because its right.
So whereas it may not be appropriate for a man to be a spokesperson for a woman’s movement it is entirely appropriate for a man to be the spokesman for a social media activated grassroots movement. Slutwalk is not a gender based movement its a movement for everyone – as the original organisers in Toronto put it, its for people.
There will always be a backlash from the establishment, whether that be current structures or current philosophy, and it will be a tragedy if as a result of this onslaught from admittedly mostly one person representing what seems to be conservative establishment thinking, the essence of slutwalk is perverted.
So would a rational group of organisers suggest that I take a spokesman’s role for #slutwalkjhb? That would depend on a numbers of things, genuineness and passion being part of them but clearly also my ability to mobilise people, my role in my social networks and my level of influence.
Do I fit the bill? Well I am rated as highly influential on twitter and that means that I am one of the 0.2% most influential people on twitter in the world. That should help. My actions like encouraging my 14yr old daughter to walk and encouraging her voice, that should help prove integrity. My ability to make the idea accessible to a broad group that should help (proven by the response on my facebook status update) and with the general community support that should be enough.
So yes I believe I do and so do the other 5 of the organising group and I will continue to fight this fight.
I encourage everyone to move on from this red herring. It’s appalling that this discussion sparked by my legitimate comment on radio over the Noord Street harassment should have distracted us from that incident.

8 thoughts on “The Red Herring over who speaks for #slutwalkjhb”

  1. Let’s just hope that out of the outcry that has emerged, created by so-called feminists, the biggest winner will be the cause itself. The growing problem of gender based violence – rape being among the most vile – can only prosper when there are petty squabbles about who has a right to fight against it. My point of view is that the more voices against rape, the better. Why should it matter who raises their voice, if they feel so passionate about the cause. Surely they are not taking anything away from anyone else who is fighting for the same cause. I therefore salute you Walter, for being willing to add your voice. Well done.


  2. “incoherent”? I’ve followed this discussion on fb and elsewhere pretty much since it started, and found Gilian’s opening comments (“vicious assault”, if you will :-)) to be perfectly intelligible. I’d be very interested, Walter, to see copy/pastes of those bits you don’t understand…?


  3. Another question while I’m here… “Slutwalk is not a gender based movement its a movement for everyone”

    So… am I to infer that ‘slut’ is a gender-neutral term?

    Or that as women reclaim the term on their own terms, so too are men (re)claiming it for themsleves as well?

    Or that there is still space for the name of the #walkjhb movement to catch up with the catholicism its grassroots?

    That last might be prolly be difficult since urban dictionary defines slut as “a woman with the morals of a man” …but it does suggest that #sluts&pervswalkjhb might be a close match in an uneven world…


  4. The gender debate is emotional and political and this means any reasoned process will be the first casualty. Until the fundamentals of gender equality are argued coherently to understand just where gender equality sits, this type of inflamed and reactionary process will rule. As a species humans are not well endowed for rational debate as we strive for power and control, so its no suprise we refect that in social institutions like feminist movements. That said, if Walter is prepared to devote time and energy to this cause why undermine this. My own view of gender equality and feminism are radical and unpopular, and attempts to debate the reality appear doomed. ould not be suprised to se


  5. It’s hard not to shout, when someone just isn’t listening to you. Unfortunately though, if you’re a woman and particularly if you’re a Feminist (GASP), shouting at men is exactly what’s expected of you: Illogic, emotion, cock-hating, weeping and so on (at this point I’d like to reiterate that I rather like men, and I definitely like cock, hey SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS ARE BOYS). So, calmly this is why, Mr. Pike, you are so infuriating:

    • You use the word “feminist” almost exclusively before the word “attacked”, as someone who is the spokesperson for a Feminist movement, encouraging anti-feminism is not ok.

    • YES SLUTWALK IS A FEMINIST MOVEMENT. Or, at least, victim-blaming is a WOMEN’S ISSUE. It was a group of girls who a Canadian policeman told not to dress like sluts, it is women who are the ones constantly put on trial when we accuse men of rape (and while boys and men are tragically too victims of rape, men are almost always the aggressors). It is us who are judged, belittled, hated and degraded if we choose to have ‘lots of sexual partners.

    • You constantly confuse speaking with speaking for. Your voice, as with all voices, should be heard. You claiming our voice, you silencing us, you ignoring us and accusing us, and you completely negating the violence and harm done unto women (YES WOMEN, SPECIFICALLY), that’s not ok.

    • You also purposefully ignore, disrespect and silence women who disagree with you. You chose to completely ignore my (calm, reasonable an clearly stated) points on your commentary, purposefully goading me by asking after my father when I questioned patriarchal authority, you accuse Gillian but fail to address her points and you unfriended Charlene Smith on Facebook because she dared to suggest that the movement would be best led by a woman. This was her final comment, shared with us, which she could not post on your wall as you ‘blocked’ her:

    ‘Of course, as a woman and a rape survivor how would I know? C’mon Walter, you have more intelligence than that, constructively engage with an open mind … when I started out as a lefty journalist writing about how awful apartheid was I felt so smug in what a ‘good person’ I was & so hurt when black people turned around & said, Charlene we can talk for ourselves. But they were right. It was a great and important lesson for me. I never stopped writing about the harm of racism, but my approach changed. And as such I became far more effective.’

    More to follow in an article soon.


  6. hmmm… to have it perfectly chauvinism-free, I’d suggest the following sentence be added to the post by Trevor above:

    “As a species humans are not well endowed for rational debate as we strive for power and control, so its no suprise we refect that in social institutions like patriarchy.”



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s