Joy Watson

Counting the Costs – The long term costs of not adequately financing shelter services

Joy Watson
Joy Watson

By Joy Watson

Jennifer was 18 years old when she married Chris. Soon after their marriage, he began to beat her and verbally and emotionally abuse her.  One night, in a drunken rage, Chris woke their sons, aged 12 and 13, at 3am and ordered them to light a fire for a braai. It was a bitterly cold night and the boys sat shivering, trying to light the fire while Jennifer tried to lull her husband back to sleep by gently stroking his head. Eventually, he fell asleep but awoke after an hour and started shouting at the boys to get up and start the fire again. In a rage, he turned on Jennifer and started hitting her.   Jennifer’s eldest son grabbed a knife and shouted at his father “Tonight I am going to kill you and I don’t care if I go to jail for it!” Jennifer knew that her turning point had come. She would not allow her son to rot in jail for punishing his father for years of sustained abuse. Taking the boys, she fled down the road in a see-through nightdress. She sought refuge at a shelter that night. Over the course of the next 3 months she received counselling to work through the violence she had been subjected to, found employment and left Chris for good. Through the interventions offered by a shelter, she was able to turn her life around and begin the long process of healing the scars of unspeakable violence and trauma.

Jennifer’s story is one facing many women. In the period September 2010 – December 2010, SAPS reported an estimated 35 495 cases of domestic violence to Parliament. Given the under-reporting in this regard, this figure is estimated to be far higher. Shelter services fall under the ambit of the Government’s Victim Empowerment Programme (VEP), a key component of the crime prevention strategy. The VEP’s policy vision is to provide adequate service delivery interventions to support victims of violent crime. Yet in practice this is often far from the case. The Heinrich Boll Foundation and Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre, through a project funded by the European Union, released in this week the findings of a study conducted at 3 shelters for victims of domestic violence in the Western Cape, St Annes; the Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children;  and Sisters Incorporated.

The research found that the Western Cape Department of Social Development provided a subsidy of just under R 30 per day for each woman and each child that accompanies his or her mother to the shelter. This amount has since increased to about R33 per woman. The allocation of funds to shelters is dismal, even prisoners receive more than this with the Department of Correctional Services allocating an amount of R313 per prisoner per day. This seriously calls into question the priority accorded to victims of gender-based violence.

Most women who come to the shelters are poor with no source of income, with no place else to go and often bringing very young children with them. The shelters need to cater to the practical needs of these women and children. This includes, amongst others, clothes, toiletries, food, health care and counselling and transport. The Department of Social Development in the Western Cape allocates a mere 1% of its total budget of R1.3 billion to the Victim Empowerment Programme. In 2011/2012, the Department had set a target of 3091 women and children accessing VEP shelter services. In actual fact, an estimated 5 860 people made use of the shelters during this time, almost double what was envisaged.

In the 2011/2012 financial year, St Anne’s received a total of R451 642 in government funding, a mere 48 % of its operating expenses. Sisters Incorporated received R 285 600, less than a third of its operating costs, while the Saartjie Baartman Centre (SBC) ran at a deficit of R148 089. The SBC had reached a point of being in dire financial straits and had to retrench staff in order to cut costs. Yet these shelters play a critical role in keeping many women and children safe from violence and are instrumental to getting them to a point of healing.

The study found that many of the women coming into shelters suffer from serious ailments such as depression, psychiatric conditions, HIV/AIDS and substance abuse. The long-term costs of not providing shelter services are far greater than allocating the estimated R114 per woman per day for adequate service provision. Violence has far-reaching ramifications, including an economic cost. The victims of violence suffer a myriad of health-related consequences and this, in turn, impacts on their lives in many ways, one of which is their ability to be at work on a regular basis and in a frame of mind where they are able to be productive.  Shelters offer so much more than a safe place for women and their children to stay. Many offer services such as crèches and children’s projects, counselling and group work, legal advice, opportunities for training in both life skills and in helping women find employment. The study in fact shows that many women who leave shelters have been assisted by shelters to enter into the economy, thereby creating a source of income.

In 2009, following public hearings on domestic violence, the national Department of Social Development made a commitment to setting up two shelters annually per province over a period of 5 years. It indicated that this was dependent on funding being available. No new shelters had been built during the time-frame of the research. Currently, many shelters are in funding crisis and the threat of closure is always a real one. Most shelters have had to work exceptionally hard and resort to extraordinary measures to make ends meet. Funding constraints negatively impact on service provision and one example of this is the limitations in offering counselling to children who are victims of domestic violence.

Ultimately, the reassessment of the support provided to shelters is a human rights issue. It is what is owed to women and children who bear the brunt of violence in the sanctity of their homes. It is time that we start counting the real, long term costs of not providing adequate support and assistance to victims of domestic violence and the consequences of living in an endless cycle of horror and torment.

Download the full report here


4 thoughts on “Counting the Costs – The long term costs of not adequately financing shelter services”

  1. It is absolutely shocking that the CEO of the National Council on Gender Based Violence will earn R1.3 million per year, which is more than it costs to run all three of these shelters. This council has poorly defined goals, no clarity on who members are or what they are doing, and a desired budget of R20 million rand. This money could be much better spent on providing shelter for women who bear the brunt of a state that is unable to protect them, and has not responded to the crisis of domestic violence.


  2. And what about the R117-million that was paid to provide security for Zuma’s Nkandla house! How many shelters for abused women could have been improved and established with that amount of money? When weighing it all up it simply seems that dealing with violence against women is not as great a priority as government says it is.


  3. If each shelter costs R33 per woman per day, and each woman who took out a protection order in 2011 went to a shelter, it would cost the Department of Social Development R6 539 610 per day.

    Surely this indicates that violence prevention programmes and programmes aimed at the socio-economic empowerment would be cheaper and are extremely necessary?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s